William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Except that in this case, between Lars offer to "ignore" his vote/veto, and > the fact that he hasn't responded in 21 months (I also emailed him directly > last week to ensure he made note of this thread), he apparently does not > feel strongly enough to either confirm his veto, or confirm his willingness > to be talked out of this veto. Jeff asked for explicit confirmation or > retraction of this veto on Dec 6th 2006, and Lars had not responded, so it > appears we can move ahead as this statement above appeared to be half-way > retracted veto, and he's unwilling to comment further to either agree with > Jim, or explicitly vote -0/distasteful.
My apologies for not responding earlier, but I was busy moving from Munich to London last week ... As far as I remember, Mads Toftum also voted with a -1. My -1 hasn't changed as I still feel very strongly about this for reasons already discussed back in 2006 (and once in 2004 or 2005 when the same discussion came up). Given two -1s and many people voting -0 I'm wondering why we are still discussing this topic? P.S.: I'm not sure what you mean with "hasn't responded in 21 months"? I voted in 2006 on this topic and then you picked up this thread last week? cheers... -- Lars Eilebrecht l...@apache.org
