There's nothing in the way we handle UDS that prevents "reuse" even understanding that we use the term "reuse" to mean both "cache the IP address" and "use the connection as a one-shot". There's no diff between UDS and sockets from the module PoV.
> On Jul 19, 2017, at 4:26 AM, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > 2017-07-18 23:00 GMT+02:00 <j...@apache.org>: > Author: jim > Date: Tue Jul 18 21:00:14 2017 > New Revision: 1802336 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1802336&view=rev > Log: > UDS does support reuse > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_fcgi.xml > > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_fcgi.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_fcgi.xml?rev=1802336&r1=1802335&r2=1802336&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_fcgi.xml (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_fcgi.xml Tue Jul 18 21:00:14 > 2017 > @@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ ProxyPassMatch "^/myapp/.*\.php(/.*)?$" > the hostname and optional port following fcgi:// are ignored.</p> > <example><title>PHP-FPM with UDS</title> > <highlight language="config"> > -# UDS does not currently support connection reuse > ProxyPassMatch "^/(.*\.php(/.*)?)$" > "unix:/var/run/php5-fpm.sock|fcgi://localhost/var/www/" > </highlight> > </example> > > > Thanks for the clarification, I was trying to figure out why we had that > warning in the docs but didn't find anything useful. While chatting with > Daniel (ezra-s) on IRC it came up that some users reported on #httpd that > mod_proxy_fcgi errors out while re-using UDS sockets, but he didn't recall > the specific issue. In a recent dev@ thread this problem came up again, so I > did a little research and the best report that I found is the following: > > http://z-issue.com/wp/apache-2-4-the-event-mpm-php-via-mod_proxy_fcgi-and-php-fpm-with-vhosts/#comment-6765 > > The user found the "UDS does not currently support connection reuse" comment > and solved the issue, so I am wondering if this was a misconfiguration from > his side or a known php-fpm limitation or a bug in mod_proxy_fcgi. I haven't > been able to reproduce and this might totally be a false alarm, but if > anybody has more info please speak up so we can investigate it properly :) > > Luca
