Why lump 2.5.0 into all this?
There is no rational reason to force connect 2.4.29 and 2.5.0
Tag 2.4.29 and leave 2.5.0 alone until people discuss it. Until then
I will veto any foolishness about 2.5.0-whatever.
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 9:19 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Is anyone seeing an issue of concern about stability on 2.4.x branch?
> Has anyone else looked at Jim's proposed fixes for xcode 9 building
> under maintainer mode? A couple-line quick fix to configure.in
> <http://configure.in/>, that
> anyone on OS/X should be able to validate in minutes. The same fix
> is already present on APR's branches, which I will tag as well.
> I'll proceed to tag 2.5.0, and 2.4.29 after a couple hour comment
> period, so that the many proposed enhancements can be examined
> by alpha testers and our quick adopters of 2.4.28 can be back on track
> by early next week. That should simplify getting some of the more
> complex patches backported as necessary, or move us forward
> in any case.