> On Nov 5, 2017, at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2017 12:21, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com > <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > > Sorry Bill, but that's not right. trunk is not a "branch" that directly leads > to a releasable branch. Its simply not. It was not intended to > be. You cannot now claim that any inability, or concern, about > releasing a RTC "sandbox" somehow implies your conclusion. > > It has always been so for 2.2.0 and 2.4.0. You are shifting perspective and > demonstrably were entirely engaged in every prior version-minor discussion. >
Because they were/are direct-to-release branches. trunk is not.