> On Nov 5, 2017, at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2017 12:21, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com
> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote:
> Sorry Bill, but that's not right. trunk is not a "branch" that directly leads
> to a releasable branch. Its simply not. It was not intended to
> be. You cannot now claim that any inability, or concern, about
> releasing a RTC "sandbox" somehow implies your conclusion.
> It has always been so for 2.2.0 and 2.4.0. You are shifting perspective and
> demonstrably were entirely engaged in every prior version-minor discussion.
Because they were/are direct-to-release branches. trunk is not.