Could it be as simple as changing <SSLPolicy> to <SSLPolicyDefine> and
leaving SSLPolicy as it is?

Cheers,
Gillis

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Stefan Eissing <
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:

> Having slept a night over this and the mod_md config change request, I say
> this leaves me somewhat sour. A request for an unspecified change by
> someone important in this project is basically blocking any progress for
> me.
>
> I am sure that was not your intention, but I feel the current choice of
> naming good, because that is why they are there, and I am not convinced
> that any alternative I come up with falls on fertile ground. That could
> lead to a groundhog day experience with me doing the work and others
> saying 'nah!' afterwards.
>
> This change is obviously important to you, so please lead a consensus on
> how it should be changed. The code change I will then do afterwards if
> no one else feels like it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stefan
>
> > Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>:
> >
> > As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to
> object to the existence of SSLPolicy and <SSLPolicy>. I think it's unwise
> to have two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support.
> >
> > As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to
> avert user confusion.
> >
> > I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific
> names. I suck at naming things.)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --Rich
>
>

Reply via email to