This is a pretty valid reason to consider 2.5. However, I'm not convinced trunk 
has fixed the funky things referred to in this thread either.
-- 
Daniel Ruggeri

On April 14, 2018 2:16:04 AM CDT, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> 
wrote:
>
>> Am 13.04.2018 um 16:00 schrieb Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>:
>> 
>> It annoys me now that the "protocol" argument to "Listen" is really 
>> quite ill-defined.  "https" is not even really a protocol, more a URL
>
>> scheme, and I can't see it documented that enables SSLEngine
>anywhere.  
>> We also have Protocols which does something completely different!
>
>Rest assured that you are not the only one annoyed by the many
>quirks und hoops-to-jump-through to make https: work.
>
>And, as you observed, any effort to fix things quickly runs into
>the "2.4.x regression" wall. Because someone out there has a
>combination
>of current configs that one never imagines.
>
>I think 2.4.x needs to freeze and we need to move on.
>
>Cheers, Stefan

Reply via email to