I went ahead and merged the PR. Thanks everyone! On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 11:56 AM Milan Stefanovic < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > The voting period is now closed. The vote was open for 7 days and the > proposal has passed with the following tally: > > Binding votes with +1 (total +8): > - Szehon Ho > - Ryan Blue > - Russel Spitzer > - Kevin Liu > - Steven Wu > - Eduard Tudenhöfner > - Fokko Driesprong > - Amogh Jahagirdar > > Non-binding votes with +1 (total +2) > - Huaxin Gao > - Gang Wu > > There were no -1 or +0 votes. > > Thank you to everyone who participated and provided feedback! > > Milan > > > On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 18:16, Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 7:36 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> On 2026/05/15 08:04:51 Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: >>> > +1 (binding) >>> > >>> > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 8:32 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > +1 (binding) >>> > > >>> > > I left some minor comments regarding syntax and grammar issues. It >>> will be >>> > > good to address them before merging. >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:47 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> >>> > >> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:39 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> +1 (binding) >>> > >>> thanks for aligning the spec >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:33 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> +1 (binding) >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Thanks for getting this clarification done. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 7:00 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:33 PM Szehon Ho < >>> [email protected]> >>> > >>>>> wrote: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>>> +1 >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Thanks for tackling this ! >>> > >>>>>> Szehon >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < >>> > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> Hi Iceberg community! >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS >>> parameter for >>> > >>>>>>> geospatial type. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted >>> as >>> > >>>>>>> either being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is >>> supposed to be >>> > >>>>>>> populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only >>> allowed formats, or >>> > >>>>>>> are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the >>> wording so >>> > >>>>>>> that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> P.S >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: >>> > >>>>>>> - >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f >>> > >>>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, >>> > >>>>>>> Milan >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>>>>>> >>> > >>> >>
