+1 (binding) On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 8:32 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > I left some minor comments regarding syntax and grammar issues. It will be > good to address them before merging. > > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:47 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:39 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> thanks for aligning the spec >>> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:33 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks for getting this clarification done. >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 7:00 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:33 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for tackling this ! >>>>>> Szehon >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Iceberg community! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS parameter for >>>>>>> geospatial type. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted as >>>>>>> either being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is supposed >>>>>>> to be >>>>>>> populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed >>>>>>> formats, or >>>>>>> are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the wording >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> P.S >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: >>>>>>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f >>>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Milan >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
