Hi everyone, The voting period is now closed. The vote was open for 7 days and the proposal has passed with the following tally:
Binding votes with +1 (total +8): - Szehon Ho - Ryan Blue - Russel Spitzer - Kevin Liu - Steven Wu - Eduard Tudenhöfner - Fokko Driesprong - Amogh Jahagirdar Non-binding votes with +1 (total +2) - Huaxin Gao - Gang Wu There were no -1 or +0 votes. Thank you to everyone who participated and provided feedback! Milan On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 18:16, Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 7:36 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> On 2026/05/15 08:04:51 Eduard Tudenhöfner wrote: >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 8:32 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (binding) >> > > >> > > I left some minor comments regarding syntax and grammar issues. It >> will be >> > > good to address them before merging. >> > > >> > > On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:47 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:39 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> +1 (binding) >> > >>> thanks for aligning the spec >> > >>> >> > >>> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 10:33 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> +1 (binding) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks for getting this clarification done. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 7:00 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:33 PM Szehon Ho < >> [email protected]> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> +1 >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Thanks for tackling this ! >> > >>>>>> Szehon >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM Milan Stefanovic < >> > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Iceberg community! >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to update wording for the CRS >> parameter for >> > >>>>>>> geospatial type. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Current spec, depending on how it's read, might be interpreted >> as >> > >>>>>>> either being suggestive or restrictive on how a CRS field is >> supposed to be >> > >>>>>>> populated (whether `srid:` and `projjson:` are the only allowed >> formats, or >> > >>>>>>> are they just suggestions/examples). Proposal is to update the >> wording so >> > >>>>>>> that the purpose is clear and there is no ambiguity. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15834. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> P.S >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> There has been similar proposal in parquet community as well: >> > >>>>>>> - >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/r5x0do8f241bpf565rx8s5s3wc9ogp0f >> > >>>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/560 >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Thanks, >> > >>>>>>> Milan >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >> >
