+1 (non-binding) Thanks Dan and Talat.
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:21 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. This proposal is incredibly useful for disaster recovery use cases > with Iceberg. Thank you for driving this! > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 Thanks Dan and Talat! >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:23 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the v4 spec as >>> defined in PR #15630 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15630>. >>> >>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative paths in v4. >>> Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec. >>> >>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dan >>> >>
