+1 (non-binding)
Gang Wu <[email protected]> 于2026年5月20日周三 16:58写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 9:28 AM Alex Stephen via dev > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Very excited for this! > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:39 PM Anurag Mantripragada > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Thanks Dan and Talat. > >> > >> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:21 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1. This proposal is incredibly useful for disaster recovery use cases > >>> with Iceberg. Thank you for driving this! > >>> > >>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 Thanks Dan and Talat! > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:23 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the v4 spec as > >>>>> defined in PR #15630. > >>>>> > >>>>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative paths in v4. > >>>>> Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec > >>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Dan
