+1 (non-binding) Very excited for this! On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:39 PM Anurag Mantripragada < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks Dan and Talat. > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:21 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1. This proposal is incredibly useful for disaster recovery use cases >> with Iceberg. Thank you for driving this! >> >> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 4:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 Thanks Dan and Talat! >>> >>> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 5:23 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey everyone, >>>> >>>> I would like to start a vote to add relative paths to the v4 spec as >>>> defined in PR #15630 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15630>. >>>> >>>> This vote confirms the agreed-upon direction for relative paths in v4. >>>> Changes can still happen until we finalize the v4 spec. >>>> >>>> Please review the PR and vote within the next 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Add relative paths to the v4 spec >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 Do not add relative paths (please provide reasoning) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dan >>>> >>>
