Any of the fixes being patched to 1.10.3 should be patched to 1.11.1 but it's not necessary that all patches applying to 1.11 also apply to 1.10.3 because maybe the feature wasn't there in 1.10 (I think there was one fix for scan planning that's in this category) or if it's not a critical correctness issue fix I would just recommend only patching it in 1.11 since we probably don't want the maintenance burden of backporting those kinds of fixes that far back.
Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 12:25 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for addressing that fix, Matt! The PR is still open for review, > ptal. > > I noticed that some PRs are tagged under the 1.10.3 milestone [1], while > others are tagged under 1.11.1 [2]. Since a PR can only be assigned to a > single milestone, I think we’ll need to backport all of those PRs to both > 1.10.x and 1.11.x. > Is that right? > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/65 > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 8:16 AM Matt Butrovich <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> After several rounds of helpful revision, this PR >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15470> to fix manifest delete >> file size after table rewrite is green and ready for another pass. I >> believe this would be a backport candidate for both 1.10.x and 1.11.x. >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 10:35 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I also went ahead and added this PR >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16692> to the 1.10.3 milestone >>> (and of course also applies to 1.11.1), I do think this is an important >>> correctness fix for default value handling and evaluation against parquet >>> metrics. The 1.11.x branch was created last week. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:36 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for the patch releases but have we created branch 1.11.x yet? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Manu >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:43 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for the patch releases. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Amogh! >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:24 AM Prashant Singh < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for driving this Amogh ! >>>>>> +1 for including preserving encryption metadata on DV merges to the >>>>>> patch releases >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Prashant >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:07 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks folks, I've created a 1.10.3 milestone >>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/65> and I also added >>>>>>> this PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15911> from Manu >>>>>>> for addressing preservation of encryption metadata for DV changes. It >>>>>>> looks >>>>>>> close, and I just had some final comments on it. I think it's >>>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>> to include for a 1.10.3 release because the issue can be considered >>>>>>> simply >>>>>>> producing incorrect V3 metadata. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:49 AM Steve <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Amogh. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is very similar to the row lineage problem patched in the >>>>>>>> 1.10.2 release. >>>>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:08 AM Neelesh Salian < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > +1 for patch releases. >>>>>>>> > Thanks Amogh >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:01 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Thanks for the fix! >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> +1 for patch release for both 1.10.x line and 1.11.x line. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> For 1.11.x, I'd like to fix forward the iceberg-rest-fixture >>>>>>>> docker image. We previously disabled it to unblock the 1.11.0 release. >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> have a PR for review, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214 >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Best, >>>>>>>> >> Kevin Liu >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 5:23 PM huaxin gao < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> I reviewed the fix (#16699): it's a contained, well-tested v3 >>>>>>>> correctness fix and a good candidate for both patches. I also agree we >>>>>>>> should keep backporting v3 correctness fixes to 1.10, since this helps >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> customers still on 1.10. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Huaxin >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:18 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> +1. Thanks for driving the patch releases. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>> Aihua >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> I think if we keep the backports narrow for 1.10, it would be >>>>>>>> easy to release and help anyone who hasn't moved forward yet. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> -Dan >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026, 12:13 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> +1. Thanks Amogh! >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 patch releases. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> There is already a milestone for 1.11.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey folks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm kicking this thread off to discuss patch releases. I've >>>>>>>> encountered a bug where the Spark rewrite manifests procedure does not >>>>>>>> carry over first row IDs correctly. I have a fix PR out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are there any other fixes folks would be interested in >>>>>>>> including in these patch releases? As a general reminder, patch >>>>>>>> releases >>>>>>>> typically cover correctness fixes, security fixes, or addressing >>>>>>>> significant regressions from the previous version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's a separate question: should we continue patching v3 >>>>>>>> metadata correctness fixes in 1.10, or should we just focus on 1.11. I >>>>>>>> think since we made the claim that we want to have solid v3 support >>>>>>>> (not >>>>>>>> necessarily all features, but certainly correctness) in 1.10 there's an >>>>>>>> argument that we should continue to backport those specific fixes to >>>>>>>> 1.10. >>>>>>>> A significant number of clients out there are on 1.10 and I think we >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>> ensure correctness for them and it's probably easier for them to >>>>>>>> upgrade a >>>>>>>> patch version than a minor version upgrade. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
