+1 for patch releases. Thanks Amogh On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:01 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the fix! > > +1 for patch release for both 1.10.x line and 1.11.x line. > > For 1.11.x, I'd like to fix forward the iceberg-rest-fixture docker image. > We previously disabled it to unblock the 1.11.0 release. I have a PR for > review, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214 > > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 5:23 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3. >> >> I reviewed the fix (#16699 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16699>): >> it's a contained, well-tested v3 correctness fix and a good candidate for >> both patches. I also agree we should keep backporting v3 correctness fixes >> to 1.10, since this helps the customers still on 1.10. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Huaxin >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:18 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1. Thanks for driving the patch releases. >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> Aihua >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> I think if we keep the backports narrow for 1.10, it would be easy to >>> release and help anyone who hasn't moved forward yet. >>> >>> -Dan >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026, 12:13 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1. Thanks Amogh! >>>> >>>> Yufei >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 patch releases. >>>>> >>>>> There is already a milestone for 1.11.1 >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm kicking this thread off to discuss patch releases. I've >>>>>> encountered a bug where the Spark rewrite manifests procedure does not >>>>>> carry over first row IDs correctly. I have a fix PR >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16699> out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there any other fixes folks would be interested in including in >>>>>> these patch releases? As a general reminder, patch releases typically >>>>>> cover >>>>>> correctness fixes, security fixes, or addressing significant regressions >>>>>> from the previous version. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's a separate question: should we continue patching v3 metadata >>>>>> correctness fixes in 1.10, or should we just focus on 1.11. I think since >>>>>> we made the claim that we want to have solid v3 support (not >>>>>> necessarily all features, but certainly correctness) in 1.10 there's an >>>>>> argument that we should continue to backport those specific fixes to >>>>>> 1.10. >>>>>> A significant number of clients out there are on 1.10 and I think we >>>>>> should >>>>>> ensure correctness for them and it's probably easier for them to upgrade >>>>>> a >>>>>> patch version than a minor version upgrade. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>> >>>>>
