Thanks folks, I've created a 1.10.3 milestone <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/65> and I also added this PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15911> from Manu for addressing preservation of encryption metadata for DV changes. It looks close, and I just had some final comments on it. I think it's appropriate to include for a 1.10.3 release because the issue can be considered simply producing incorrect V3 metadata.
Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:49 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Amogh. > > This is very similar to the row lineage problem patched in the 1.10.2 > release. > +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:08 AM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 for patch releases. > > Thanks Amogh > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:01 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for the fix! > >> > >> +1 for patch release for both 1.10.x line and 1.11.x line. > >> > >> For 1.11.x, I'd like to fix forward the iceberg-rest-fixture docker > image. We previously disabled it to unblock the 1.11.0 release. I have a PR > for review, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214 > >> > >> > >> Best, > >> Kevin Liu > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 5:23 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3. > >>> > >>> I reviewed the fix (#16699): it's a contained, well-tested v3 > correctness fix and a good candidate for both patches. I also agree we > should keep backporting v3 correctness fixes to 1.10, since this helps the > customers still on 1.10. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Huaxin > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:18 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1. Thanks for driving the patch releases. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Aihua > >>>> > >>>> On Jun 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> I think if we keep the backports narrow for 1.10, it would be easy to > release and help anyone who hasn't moved forward yet. > >>>> > >>>> -Dan > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026, 12:13 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1. Thanks Amogh! > >>>>> > >>>>> Yufei > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 patch releases. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is already a milestone for 1.11.1 > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hey folks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm kicking this thread off to discuss patch releases. I've > encountered a bug where the Spark rewrite manifests procedure does not > carry over first row IDs correctly. I have a fix PR out. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Are there any other fixes folks would be interested in including > in these patch releases? As a general reminder, patch releases typically > cover correctness fixes, security fixes, or addressing significant > regressions from the previous version. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There's a separate question: should we continue patching v3 > metadata correctness fixes in 1.10, or should we just focus on 1.11. I > think since we made the claim that we want to have solid v3 support (not > necessarily all features, but certainly correctness) in 1.10 there's an > argument that we should continue to backport those specific fixes to 1.10. > A significant number of clients out there are on 1.10 and I think we should > ensure correctness for them and it's probably easier for them to upgrade a > patch version than a minor version upgrade. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >
