yea that makes sense, thanks for explaining. btw it would be great to include the iceberg-rest-fixture fixes in the 1.11.x patch release, so we can re-enable publishing the docker image. Here's the first PR https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214
On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 12:52 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: > Any of the fixes being patched to 1.10.3 should be patched to 1.11.1 but > it's not necessary that all patches applying to 1.11 also apply to 1.10.3 > because maybe the feature wasn't there in 1.10 (I think there was one fix > for scan planning that's in this category) or if it's not a critical > correctness issue fix I would just recommend only patching it in 1.11 since > we probably don't want the maintenance burden of backporting those kinds of > fixes that far back. > > Thanks, > Amogh Jahagirdar > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 12:25 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for addressing that fix, Matt! The PR is still open for review, >> ptal. >> >> I noticed that some PRs are tagged under the 1.10.3 milestone [1], while >> others are tagged under 1.11.1 [2]. Since a PR can only be assigned to a >> single milestone, I think we’ll need to backport all of those PRs to both >> 1.10.x and 1.11.x. >> Is that right? >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/65 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 8:16 AM Matt Butrovich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> After several rounds of helpful revision, this PR >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15470> to fix manifest delete >>> file size after table rewrite is green and ready for another pass. I >>> believe this would be a backport candidate for both 1.10.x and 1.11.x. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 10:35 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I also went ahead and added this PR >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16692> to the 1.10.3 milestone >>>> (and of course also applies to 1.11.1), I do think this is an important >>>> correctness fix for default value handling and evaluation against parquet >>>> metrics. The 1.11.x branch was created last week. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:36 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for the patch releases but have we created branch 1.11.x yet? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Manu >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:43 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for the patch releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Amogh! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:24 AM Prashant Singh < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for driving this Amogh ! >>>>>>> +1 for including preserving encryption metadata on DV merges to the >>>>>>> patch releases >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:07 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks folks, I've created a 1.10.3 milestone >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/65> and I also added >>>>>>>> this PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15911> from Manu >>>>>>>> for addressing preservation of encryption metadata for DV changes. It >>>>>>>> looks >>>>>>>> close, and I just had some final comments on it. I think it's >>>>>>>> appropriate >>>>>>>> to include for a 1.10.3 release because the issue can be considered >>>>>>>> simply >>>>>>>> producing incorrect V3 metadata. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:49 AM Steve <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Amogh. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is very similar to the row lineage problem patched in the >>>>>>>>> 1.10.2 release. >>>>>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:08 AM Neelesh Salian < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > +1 for patch releases. >>>>>>>>> > Thanks Amogh >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:01 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Thanks for the fix! >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> +1 for patch release for both 1.10.x line and 1.11.x line. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> For 1.11.x, I'd like to fix forward the iceberg-rest-fixture >>>>>>>>> docker image. We previously disabled it to unblock the 1.11.0 >>>>>>>>> release. I >>>>>>>>> have a PR for review, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214 >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Best, >>>>>>>>> >> Kevin Liu >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 5:23 PM huaxin gao < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3. >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> I reviewed the fix (#16699): it's a contained, well-tested v3 >>>>>>>>> correctness fix and a good candidate for both patches. I also agree we >>>>>>>>> should keep backporting v3 correctness fixes to 1.10, since this >>>>>>>>> helps the >>>>>>>>> customers still on 1.10. >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> Huaxin >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:18 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> +1. Thanks for driving the patch releases. >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>> Aihua >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> I think if we keep the backports narrow for 1.10, it would be >>>>>>>>> easy to release and help anyone who hasn't moved forward yet. >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> -Dan >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026, 12:13 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> +1. Thanks Amogh! >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 patch releases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> There is already a milestone for 1.11.1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey folks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm kicking this thread off to discuss patch releases. >>>>>>>>> I've encountered a bug where the Spark rewrite manifests procedure >>>>>>>>> does not >>>>>>>>> carry over first row IDs correctly. I have a fix PR out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are there any other fixes folks would be interested in >>>>>>>>> including in these patch releases? As a general reminder, patch >>>>>>>>> releases >>>>>>>>> typically cover correctness fixes, security fixes, or addressing >>>>>>>>> significant regressions from the previous version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's a separate question: should we continue patching >>>>>>>>> v3 metadata correctness fixes in 1.10, or should we just focus on >>>>>>>>> 1.11. I >>>>>>>>> think since we made the claim that we want to have solid v3 support >>>>>>>>> (not >>>>>>>>> necessarily all features, but certainly correctness) in 1.10 there's >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> argument that we should continue to backport those specific fixes to >>>>>>>>> 1.10. >>>>>>>>> A significant number of clients out there are on 1.10 and I think we >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> ensure correctness for them and it's probably easier for them to >>>>>>>>> upgrade a >>>>>>>>> patch version than a minor version upgrade. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
