Thanks Amogh. This is very similar to the row lineage problem patched in the 1.10.2 release. +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3
On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:08 AM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for patch releases. > Thanks Amogh > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 9:01 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the fix! >> >> +1 for patch release for both 1.10.x line and 1.11.x line. >> >> For 1.11.x, I'd like to fix forward the iceberg-rest-fixture docker image. >> We previously disabled it to unblock the 1.11.0 release. I have a PR for >> review, https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16214 >> >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 5:23 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3. >>> >>> I reviewed the fix (#16699): it's a contained, well-tested v3 correctness >>> fix and a good candidate for both patches. I also agree we should keep >>> backporting v3 correctness fixes to 1.10, since this helps the customers >>> still on 1.10. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Huaxin >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 4:18 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1. Thanks for driving the patch releases. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Aihua >>>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I think if we keep the backports narrow for 1.10, it would be easy to >>>> release and help anyone who hasn't moved forward yet. >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026, 12:13 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1. Thanks Amogh! >>>>> >>>>> Yufei >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 12:08 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for both 1.11.1 and 1.10.3 patch releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is already a milestone for 1.11.1 >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestone/63 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:10 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm kicking this thread off to discuss patch releases. I've encountered >>>>>>> a bug where the Spark rewrite manifests procedure does not carry over >>>>>>> first row IDs correctly. I have a fix PR out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are there any other fixes folks would be interested in including in >>>>>>> these patch releases? As a general reminder, patch releases typically >>>>>>> cover correctness fixes, security fixes, or addressing significant >>>>>>> regressions from the previous version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's a separate question: should we continue patching v3 metadata >>>>>>> correctness fixes in 1.10, or should we just focus on 1.11. I think >>>>>>> since we made the claim that we want to have solid v3 support (not >>>>>>> necessarily all features, but certainly correctness) in 1.10 there's an >>>>>>> argument that we should continue to backport those specific fixes to >>>>>>> 1.10. A significant number of clients out there are on 1.10 and I think >>>>>>> we should ensure correctness for them and it's probably easier for them >>>>>>> to upgrade a patch version than a minor version upgrade. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar
