+1 (non-binding)

On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> vaquar khan <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni 2026 um 07:31:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Viquar Khan
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  +1 (non binding)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This spec
>>>>> defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VthBz0S2I39TeQM8oiF9_gSPQu_gHAjWXvdFpv0QqDk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.54u4q3416qx8>
>>>>> that Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean
>>>>> up expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) 
>>>>> and
>>>>> to enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata,
>>>>> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK`
>>>>> constraints (`col < 360.0`).
>>>>>
>>>>> This spec is PR #16652 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16652>.
>>>>> Thank you to everyone that has discussed this in community syncs or
>>>>> reviewed the design doc and PR!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec
>>>>> [ ] +0: . . .
>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to