Sorry, I replied with the wrong account yesterday. This passes with 30 +1 votes (13 binding) and no -1 or +0.
Thanks for reviewing, everyone! On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 12:00 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 8:04 PM Huang-Hsiang Cheng <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Jun 29, 2026, at 10:03 AM, Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding). Thanks Ryan. >> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:45 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On 2026/06/29 05:13:01 Steve wrote: >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 12:10 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > +1 (non-binding) >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 8:35 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> >>> > >> It would be great if the minor comments could be addressed, but >>> > >> they're not blocking. >>> > >> >>> > >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:38 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >> > >>> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> vaquar khan <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni >>> 2026 um 07:31: >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> Regards, >>> > >> >>> Viquar Khan >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>> > >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>>>> Regards >>> > >> >>>>> JB >>> > >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. >>> This spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that >>> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up >>> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and to >>> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata, >>> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` >>> constraints (`col < 360.0`). >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has >>> discussed this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks, >>> > >> >>>>>> >>> > >> >>>>>> Ryan >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> Regards >>> > >> Junwang Zhao >>> > >>> >> >>
