+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 8:04 PM Huang-Hsiang Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Jun 29, 2026, at 10:03 AM, Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks Ryan. > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:45 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On 2026/06/29 05:13:01 Steve wrote: >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 12:10 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 8:35 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> +1 (non-binding) >> > >> >> > >> It would be great if the minor comments could be addressed, but >> > >> they're not blocking. >> > >> >> > >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:38 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> > >> >> >> > >> >> vaquar khan <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni 2026 >> um 07:31: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> Regards, >> > >> >>> Viquar Khan >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Regards >> > >> >>>>> JB >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. >> This spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that >> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up >> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and to >> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata, >> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` >> constraints (`col < 360.0`). >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has >> discussed this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >> > >> >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Thanks, >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Ryan >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Regards >> > >> Junwang Zhao >> > >> > >
