+1 (binding)
On 2026/06/29 05:13:01 Steve wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 12:10 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 8:35 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> It would be great if the minor comments could be addressed, but > >> they're not blocking. > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:38 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > >> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> +1 (non-binding) > >> >> > >> >> vaquar khan <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni 2026 um > >> >> 07:31: > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 (non-binding) > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Viquar Khan > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao <[email protected]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> +1 (non binding) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Regards > >> >>>>> JB > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Hi everyone, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This > >> >>>>>> spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that > >> >>>>>> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to > >> >>>>>> clean up expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging > >> >>>>>> query filters) and to enable new use cases that require expressions > >> >>>>>> to be stored in metadata, including expression defaults > >> >>>>>> (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` constraints (`col < 360.0`). > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has discussed > >> >>>>>> this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec > >> >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . > >> >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Ryan > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards > >> Junwang Zhao >
