+1 (non-binding) It would be great if the minor comments could be addressed, but they're not blocking.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:38 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> vaquar khan <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni 2026 um 07:31: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Viquar Khan >>> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This spec >>>>>> defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that Iceberg >>>>>> formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up >>>>>> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and >>>>>> to enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in >>>>>> metadata, including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and >>>>>> `CHECK` constraints (`col < 360.0`). >>>>>> >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has discussed this in >>>>>> community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ryan -- Regards Junwang Zhao
