Hi Update for DML testing:
IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from previous failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > Vladimir, > > Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> > > Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is > being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. > http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < > http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> > > — > Denis > > > On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you > > completed as a part of 1.8 release. > > > > Vladimir. > > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts in > >> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see > following > >> unclear points > >> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only > >> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? > In > >> that case why do not make one module? > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > >> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in > >>> 1.8 branch). > >>> > >>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull > >>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). > >>> > >>> - Alex > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>: > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I found two issues for 1.8: > >>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message > >>> because > >>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304> > >>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> > >>>> > >>>> Could someone experienced take a look? > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < > >> voze...@gridgain.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Folks, > >>>>> > >>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several > >>> problems > >>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in > >>> ignite-1.8 > >>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next > >>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). > >>>>> > >>>>> Any objections? > >>>>> > >>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But > >> now > >>> we > >>>>>> have some > >>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. > >> There > >>>>> is a > >>>>>> ticket for > >>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>> Igor > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Alexander, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? > >> Can I > >>>>>> start > >>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < > >>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> — > >>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now > >> good > >>> to > >>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be > >>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new > >>> features > >>>>> on > >>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On failing tests: > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? > >>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko > >>>>>>>> <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: > >>>>>>>>> Vlad, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Most likely today. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < > >> voze...@gridgain.com > >>>> : > >>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems > >>> that > >>>>> we > >>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest > >>>>> remaining > >>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for > >>> 1.8 > >>>>> as > >>>>>>> soon > >>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might > >>>>> happen? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < > >> dma...@apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Roman, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. > >> Recently > >>>>>> there > >>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties > >>>>> related > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions > >>>>>>> co-exist at > >>>>>>>>>>> the same time. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the > >>>>>>> documentation > >>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a > >>> hidden > >>>>>> page > >>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible > >>> once > >>>>> the > >>>>>>> next > >>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a > >>> suffix > >>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create > >>>>>>> readme.io < > >>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > >>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > >>>>> td10868.html > >>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > >>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > >>>>>> td10868.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh > >>>>>> <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged > >>> into > >>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the > >> overall > >>>>> merge > >>>>>>>>>>> happens. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < > >>> isap...@gridgain.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML > >> they > >>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>> break tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that > >>>>> before > >>>>>>> DML > >>>>>>>>>>> is merged. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge > >> my > >>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>>>> and check > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests > >> and > >>>>>>> examples > >>>>>>>>>>> are ready. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > >>>>>>> ptupit...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: > >> CacheEntryProcessor > >>>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>>>> mode) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. > >>> But I > >>>>>>> can't > >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < > >>> dma...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related > >> changes > >>>>> into > >>>>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] > >>> documentation > >>>>>>> and be > >>>>>>>>>>> sure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET > >>>>>> usability > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache > >> Ignite > >>>>>> users? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < > >>> dma...@gridgain.com > >>>>>>> <mailto: > >>>>>>>>>>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who > >> can > >>>>> take > >>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto: > >>> alexander.a.paschenko@ > >>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is > >>> mostly > >>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify > >>>>>> streamer's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved > >>> easily). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary > >>> hash > >>>>>> codes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 > >> branch, > >>> I > >>>>>> will > >>>>>>> ask > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as > >> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of > >>> auto > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very > >>>>>> hashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests > >> passed. > >>> So > >>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sergey Kozlov > >>>> GridGain Systems > >>>> www.gridgain.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sergey Kozlov > >> GridGain Systems > >> www.gridgain.com > >> > > -- Sergey Kozlov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
