Igniters, I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 Vladimir. On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> wrote: > Denis, > > I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already > resolved > by another fix made by Alexander. > > For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 > [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 > > Best Regards, > Igor > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP > PDO > > side. > > > > The first one is related to DML. > > DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> > > > > Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before > > 1.8 is sent for vote. > > > > The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor > > S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. > > ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> > > > > — > > Denis > > > > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Update for DML testing: > > > > > > IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from > > previous > > > failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Vladimir, > > >> > > >> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> > > >> > > >> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation > is > > >> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. > > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < > > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> > > >> > > >> — > > >> Denis > > >> > > >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Folks, > > >>> > > >>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets > you > > >>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. > > >>> > > >>> Vladimir. > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi > > >>>> > > >>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts > > in > > >>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see > > >> following > > >>>> unclear points > > >>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only > > >>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on > ignite-cassandra-store? > > >> In > > >>>> that case why do not make one module? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged > > in > > >>>>> 1.8 branch). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull > > >>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - Alex > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>> Hi > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: > > >>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send > message > > >>>>> because > > >>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304 > > > > >>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result > > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < > > >>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports > several > > >>>>> problems > > >>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in > > >>>>> ignite-1.8 > > >>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the > > next > > >>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Any objections? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Vladimir. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego < > [email protected] > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. > But > > >>>> now > > >>>>> we > > >>>>>>>> have some > > >>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. > > >>>> There > > >>>>>>> is a > > >>>>>>>> ticket for > > >>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>>> Igor > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected] > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Alexander, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? > > >>>> Can I > > >>>>>>>> start > > >>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < > > >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now > > >>>> good > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will > be > > >>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new > > >>>>> features > > >>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? > > >>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko > > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it > seems > > >>>>> that > > >>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest > > >>>>>>> remaining > > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch > for > > >>>>> 1.8 > > >>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>> soon > > >>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might > > >>>>>>> happen? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. > > >>>> Recently > > >>>>>>>> there > > >>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties > > >>>>>>> related > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation > versions > > >>>>>>>>> co-exist at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for > the > > >>>>>>>>> documentation > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a > > >>>>> hidden > > >>>>>>>> page > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible > > >>>>> once > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> next > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a > > >>>>> suffix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will > create > > >>>>>>>>> readme.io < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > > >>>>>>> td10868.html > > >>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > > >>>>>>>> td10868.html> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh > > >>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged > > >>>>> into > > >>>>>>> 1.8 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the > > >>>> overall > > >>>>>>> merge > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML > > >>>> they > > >>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing > that > > >>>>>>> before > > >>>>>>>>> DML > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to > merge > > >>>> my > > >>>>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and check > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests > > >>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> examples > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: > > >>>> CacheEntryProcessor > > >>>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for > 1.8. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I > can. > > >>>>> But I > > >>>>>>>>> can't > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related > > >>>> changes > > >>>>>>> into > > >>>>>>>>> 1.8 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] > > >>>>> documentation > > >>>>>>>>> and be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the > .NET > > >>>>>>>> usability > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache > > >>>> Ignite > > >>>>>>>> users? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>> <mailto: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who > > >>>> can > > >>>>>>> take > > >>>>>>>>> over > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: > > >>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is > > >>>>> mostly > > >>>>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify > > >>>>>>>> streamer's > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved > > >>>>> easily). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary > > >>>>> hash > > >>>>>>>> codes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 > > >>>> branch, > > >>>>> I > > >>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>> ask > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as > > >>>> follows: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version > of > > >>>>> auto > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these > very > > >>>>>>>> hashing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests > > >>>> passed. > > >>>>> So > > >>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sergey Kozlov > > > GridGain Systems > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > >
