Alexander, thanks for making the fixes to DML. Are you adding JUnits for all the fixes you are making?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Hi > > Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better! > > I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release: > > IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the > result from the right side > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362> > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Vladimir, > > > > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it? > > > > — > > Denis > > > > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks > like > > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which > looks > > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and > > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns. > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Denis, > > >> > > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was > > already > > >> resolved > > >> by another fix made by Alexander. > > >> > > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. > > >> > > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 > > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 > > >> > > >> Best Regards, > > >> Igor > > >> > > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from > PHP > > >> PDO > > >>> side. > > >>> > > >>> The first one is related to DML. > > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> > > >>> > > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue > before > > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote. > > >>> > > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. > > Igor > > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. > > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in > DSN < > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> > > >>> > > >>> — > > >>> Denis > > >>> > > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi > > >>>> > > >>>> Update for DML testing: > > >>>> > > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from > > >>> previous > > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/ > > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Vladimir, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote > computation > > >> is > > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. > > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < > > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> — > > >>>>> Denis > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < > voze...@gridgain.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable > tickets > > >> you > > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Vladimir. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov < > > skoz...@gridgain.com > > >>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three > > parts > > >>> in > > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see > > >>>>> following > > >>>>>>> unclear points > > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only > > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on > > >> ignite-cassandra-store? > > >>>>> In > > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already > > merged > > >>> in > > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch). > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull > > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not > fixed). > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com > >: > > >>>>>>>>> Hi > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: > > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send > > >> message > > >>>>>>>> because > > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/ > > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304 > > >>> > > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result > > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < > > >>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports > > >> several > > >>>>>>>> problems > > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization > in > > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8 > > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for > the > > >>> next > > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego < > > >> isap...@gridgain.com > > >>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. > > >> But > > >>>>>>> now > > >>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>> have some > > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on > > them. > > >>>>>>> There > > >>>>>>>>>> is a > > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for > > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda < > > dma...@apache.org > > >>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related > changes? > > >>>>>>> Can I > > >>>>>>>>>>> start > > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme. > io/docs/pdo-interoperability > > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is > now > > >>>>>>> good > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes > will > > >> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new > > >>>>>>>> features > > >>>>>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases > (shortly): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < > > >>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it > > >> seems > > >>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the > biggest > > >>>>>>>>>> remaining > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch > > >> for > > >>>>>>>> 1.8 > > >>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it > > might > > >>>>>>>>>> happen? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. > > >>>>>>> Recently > > >>>>>>>>>>> there > > >>>>>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the > > difficulties > > >>>>>>>>>> related > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation > > >> versions > > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for > > >> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to > create a > > >>>>>>>> hidden > > >>>>>>>>>>> page > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it > > visible > > >>>>>>>> once > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> next > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page > with > > a > > >>>>>>>> suffix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will > > >> create > > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh > > >>>>>>>>>>> <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets > > merged > > >>>>>>>> into > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the > > >>>>>>> overall > > >>>>>>>>>> merge > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < > > >>>>>>>> isap...@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without > DML > > >>>>>>> they > > >>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing > > >> that > > >>>>>>>>>> before > > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to > > >> merge > > >>>>>>> my > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, > > tests > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ptupit...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: > > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor > > >>>>>>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for > > >> 1.8. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I > > >> can. > > >>>>>>>> But I > > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related > > >>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>>> into > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] > > >>>>>>>> documentation > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the > > >> .NET > > >>>>>>>>>>> usability > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache > > >>>>>>> Ignite > > >>>>>>>>>>> users? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 > > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 > > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>>> dma...@gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone > who > > >>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>> take > > >>>>>>>>>>>> over > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto: > > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness > is > > >>>>>>>> mostly > > >>>>>>>>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to > > specify > > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved > > >>>>>>>> easily). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after > > binary > > >>>>>>>> hash > > >>>>>>>>>>> codes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 > > >>>>>>> branch, > > >>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live > > in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as > > >>>>>>> follows: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first > version > > >> of > > >>>>>>>> auto > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these > > >> very > > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests > > >>>>>>> passed. > > >>>>>>>> So > > >>>>>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Sergey Kozlov > GridGain Systems > www.gridgain.com >
