Hi Recent fixes from Alexander made DML much better!
I've found one issue but it is not blocker for the release: IGNITE-4362 DML: the multiplication for SET uses the data type for the result from the right side <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4362> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > Vladimir, > > Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it? > > — > Denis > > > On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Igniters, > > > > I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like > > we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks > > pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and > > start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340 > > > > Vladimir. > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Denis, > >> > >> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was > already > >> resolved > >> by another fix made by Alexander. > >> > >> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. > >> > >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 > >> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Igor > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP > >> PDO > >>> side. > >>> > >>> The first one is related to DML. > >>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> > >>> > >>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before > >>> 1.8 is sent for vote. > >>> > >>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. > Igor > >>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. > >>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN < > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> > >>> > >>> — > >>> Denis > >>> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> Update for DML testing: > >>>> > >>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from > >>> previous > >>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/ > >> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Vladimir, > >>>>> > >>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> > >>>>> > >>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation > >> is > >>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < > >>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > >>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> > >>>>> > >>>>> — > >>>>> Denis > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets > >> you > >>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov < > [email protected] > >>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three > parts > >>> in > >>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see > >>>>> following > >>>>>>> unclear points > >>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only > >>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on > >> ignite-cassandra-store? > >>>>> In > >>>>>>> that case why do not make one module? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already > merged > >>> in > >>>>>>>> 1.8 branch). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull > >>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>> Hi > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send > >> message > >>>>>>>> because > >>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-4304 > >>> > >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result > >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports > >> several > >>>>>>>> problems > >>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in > >>>>>>>> ignite-1.8 > >>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the > >>> next > >>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. > >> But > >>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>> have some > >>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on > them. > >>>>>>> There > >>>>>>>>>> is a > >>>>>>>>>>> ticket for > >>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Igor > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda < > [email protected] > >>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? > >>>>>>> Can I > >>>>>>>>>>> start > >>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability > < > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now > >>>>>>> good > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will > >> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new > >>>>>>>> features > >>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? > >>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it > >> seems > >>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest > >>>>>>>>>> remaining > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch > >> for > >>>>>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it > might > >>>>>>>>>> happen? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. > >>>>>>> Recently > >>>>>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the > difficulties > >>>>>>>>>> related > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation > >> versions > >>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for > >> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a > >>>>>>>> hidden > >>>>>>>>>>> page > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it > visible > >>>>>>>> once > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> next > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with > a > >>>>>>>> suffix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will > >> create > >>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > >>>>>>>>>> td10868.html > >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > >>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets > merged > >>>>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the > >>>>>>> overall > >>>>>>>>>> merge > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML > >>>>>>> they > >>>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing > >> that > >>>>>>>>>> before > >>>>>>>>>>>> DML > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to > >> merge > >>>>>>> my > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, > tests > >>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> examples > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: > >>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor > >>>>>>>>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for > >> 1.8. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I > >> can. > >>>>>>>> But I > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related > >>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] > >>>>>>>> documentation > >>>>>>>>>>>> and be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the > >> .NET > >>>>>>>>>>> usability > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache > >>>>>>> Ignite > >>>>>>>>>>> users? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 > < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 > < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who > >>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>> take > >>>>>>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: > >>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is > >>>>>>>> mostly > >>>>>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to > specify > >>>>>>>>>>> streamer's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved > >>>>>>>> easily). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after > binary > >>>>>>>> hash > >>>>>>>>>>> codes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 > >>>>>>> branch, > >>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>> ask > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live > in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as > >>>>>>> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version > >> of > >>>>>>>> auto > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these > >> very > >>>>>>>>>>> hashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests > >>>>>>> passed. > >>>>>>>> So > >>>>>>>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > >>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems > >>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > >>>>>>> GridGain Systems > >>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sergey Kozlov > >>>> GridGain Systems > >>>> www.gridgain.com > >>> > >>> > >> > > -- Sergey Kozlov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
