Denis, I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already resolved by another fix made by Alexander.
For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR. [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346 [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347 Best Regards, Igor On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP PDO > side. > > The first one is related to DML. > DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346> > > Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before > 1.8 is sent for vote. > > The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor > S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well. > ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347> > > — > Denis > > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Update for DML testing: > > > > IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from > previous > > failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4342> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Vladimir, > >> > >> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 < > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310> > >> > >> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation is > >> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here. > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods < > >> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate- > >> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods> > >> > >> — > >> Denis > >> > >>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Folks, > >>> > >>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets you > >>> completed as a part of 1.8 release. > >>> > >>> Vladimir. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three parts > in > >>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see > >> following > >>>> unclear points > >>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only > >>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on ignite-cassandra-store? > >> In > >>>> that case why do not make one module? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged > in > >>>>> 1.8 branch). > >>>>> > >>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull > >>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). > >>>>> > >>>>> - Alex > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>: > >>>>>> Hi > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8: > >>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message > >>>>> because > >>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304> > >>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < > >>>> voze...@gridgain.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several > >>>>> problems > >>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in > >>>>> ignite-1.8 > >>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the > next > >>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But > >>>> now > >>>>> we > >>>>>>>> have some > >>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. > >>>> There > >>>>>>> is a > >>>>>>>> ticket for > >>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>> Igor > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Alexander, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? > >>>> Can I > >>>>>>>> start > >>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < > >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now > >>>> good > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be > >>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new > >>>>> features > >>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On failing tests: > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? > >>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko > >>>>>>>>>> <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>> Vlad, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov < > >>>> voze...@gridgain.com > >>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems > >>>>> that > >>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest > >>>>>>> remaining > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for > >>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>> soon > >>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might > >>>>>>> happen? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>> dma...@apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. > >>>> Recently > >>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties > >>>>>>> related > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions > >>>>>>>>> co-exist at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the > >>>>>>>>> documentation > >>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a > >>>>> hidden > >>>>>>>> page > >>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible > >>>>> once > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> next > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after the release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a > >>>>> suffix > >>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create > >>>>>>>>> readme.io < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > >>>>>>> td10868.html > >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > >>>>>>>> td10868.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh > >>>>>>>> <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged > >>>>> into > >>>>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the > >>>> overall > >>>>>>> merge > >>>>>>>>>>>>> happens. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego < > >>>>> isap...@gridgain.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML > >>>> they > >>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that > >>>>>>> before > >>>>>>>>> DML > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge > >>>> my > >>>>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and check > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests > >>>> and > >>>>>>>>> examples > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > >>>>>>>>> ptupit...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: > >>>> CacheEntryProcessor > >>>>>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. > >>>>> But I > >>>>>>>>> can't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>> dma...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related > >>>> changes > >>>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>> 1.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] > >>>>> documentation > >>>>>>>>> and be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET > >>>>>>>> usability > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache > >>>> Ignite > >>>>>>>> users? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda < > >>>>> dma...@gridgain.com > >>>>>>>>> <mailto: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who > >>>> can > >>>>>>> take > >>>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process of 1.8? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto: > >>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status on DML: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is > >>>>> mostly > >>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify > >>>>>>>> streamer's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved > >>>>> easily). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary > >>>>> hash > >>>>>>>> codes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 > >>>> branch, > >>>>> I > >>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>> ask > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as > >>>> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of > >>>>> auto > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very > >>>>>>>> hashing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests > >>>> passed. > >>>>> So > >>>>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take a look? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > >>>>>> GridGain Systems > >>>>>> www.gridgain.com > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sergey Kozlov > >>>> GridGain Systems > >>>> www.gridgain.com > >>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sergey Kozlov > > GridGain Systems > > www.gridgain.com > >
