Big +1 for me. It has the concurrent modification fix that I've been looking forward to. We use Turtle output fairly heavily so I'll give 2.10.1 a spin through our tests just to be sure it hasn't messed up anything. I'll try to do that over the weekend.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > There is one other change of note albeit minor. > > Parser-generated blank node labels change (except RDF/XML). > > N-Triples/N-Quads print using the internal label (for scalability). > > This should not matter to anyone but it is visible. It may cause the odd > question. > > Andy > > > On 12/04/13 18:54, Claude Warren wrote: > >> +1 for now >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> How do people feel about a Jena 2.10.1? >>> >>> The big change I've added is the new RIOT writers, which are active by >>> default. I'd like to do longer cycle on users@ because, while I've >>> tried >>> not to make visible changes, there will be some differences in the detail >>> of output for Turtle. While I don't expect a lot of responses, I think >>> it's worth at least giving people the chance to check before the release. >>> >>> Are there things anyone wants to get into Jena 2.10.1? (and when might it >>> be ready?) >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- Regards, * * *Stephen Owens* CTO, ThoughtWire t 647.351.9473 ext.104 I m 416.697.3466
