Fixing JENA-440 (query timeouts) has taken longer than I'd hoped, then I
was away for a couple of days. But the timeout changes are something
I'm quite keen that is tested properly.
Done now. I'll send email to users@ ASAP after forcing a deployment to
the snapshot repository. The announcement will need JENA-440 and
JENA-439 (wrong HTTP status code on timeouts) pointing out as worthy of
testing.
Everyone - this doesn't close the codebase to fixes - what other JIRA to
aim for (but treat as blocking),
Andy
On 25/04/13 18:49, Rob Vesse wrote:
Andy
So are we all OK with moving towards a next release?
Other than finishing up some more tests for JENA-445 (the OpAsQuery with
sub-queries bug) I don't have anything else that I want to get in the
release, the release already includes a variety of bug fixes that I need
to close out some internal bugs here so getting it sooner rather than
later would be nice
I can send out the email to the lists if you like?
Rob
On 4/19/13 11:06 AM, "Stephen Owens" <[email protected]> wrote:
I ran all of our Turtle tests against it and it performed well, no
complaints on any of the functionality. We had to change white space
handling slightly in our test cases and it seems a little more permissive,
a double semi-colon after a statement used to cause a syntax failure and
is
now silently passed. The new behaviour seems correct to me so no
complaints.
+1
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Stephen Owens
<[email protected]
wrote:
Big +1 for me. It has the concurrent modification fix that I've been
looking forward to. We use Turtle output fairly heavily so I'll give
2.10.1
a spin through our tests just to be sure it hasn't messed up anything.
I'll
try to do that over the weekend.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
There is one other change of note albeit minor.
Parser-generated blank node labels change (except RDF/XML).
N-Triples/N-Quads print using the internal label (for scalability).
This should not matter to anyone but it is visible. It may cause the
odd
question.
Andy
On 12/04/13 18:54, Claude Warren wrote:
+1 for now
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
wrote:
How do people feel about a Jena 2.10.1?
The big change I've added is the new RIOT writers, which are active
by
default. I'd like to do longer cycle on users@ because, while I've
tried
not to make visible changes, there will be some differences in the
detail
of output for Turtle. While I don't expect a lot of responses, I
think
it's worth at least giving people the chance to check before the
release.
Are there things anyone wants to get into Jena 2.10.1? (and when
might
it
be ready?)
Andy
--
Regards,
*
*
*Stephen Owens*
CTO, ThoughtWire
t 647.351.9473 ext.104 I m 416.697.3466
--
Regards,
*
*
*Stephen Owens*
CTO, ThoughtWire
t 647.351.9473 ext.104 I m 416.697.3466
