Rob,

Fine by me (I have now linked the ParameterizedSparqlString page into the query main documentation page).

Is it OK to ask now on users@ for testing? I think that the writer changes deserve a long(er) time so maybe a month. That's not a promise to release on a particualr schedule - just start the prerelease cycle.

If the HTTP usage checking takes longer, so be it.

        Andy

On 15/04/13 23:56, Rob Vesse wrote:
I still want to try and finish up some additional tests for
ParameterizedSparqlString

I also have another potential issue with HTTP request support that applies
to both queries and updates that I would like to at least investigate and
document prior to the release.  For those wondering the specific issue is
being able to maintain cookie state over a series of requests which is
necessary if you want to use any sort of forms/cookie based authentication
against remote endpoints.

Rob


On 4/12/13 2:21 PM, "Stephen Owens" <[email protected]> wrote:

Big +1 for me. It has the concurrent modification fix that I've been
looking forward to. We use Turtle output fairly heavily so I'll give
2.10.1
a spin through our tests just to be sure it hasn't messed up anything.
I'll
try to do that over the weekend.


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

There is one other change of note albeit minor.

Parser-generated blank node labels change (except RDF/XML).

N-Triples/N-Quads print using the internal label (for scalability).

This should not matter to anyone but it is visible.  It may cause the
odd
question.

         Andy


On 12/04/13 18:54, Claude Warren wrote:

+1 for now

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

  How do people feel about a Jena 2.10.1?

The big change I've added is the new RIOT writers, which are active by
default.  I'd like to do longer cycle on users@ because, while I've
tried
not to make visible changes, there will be some differences in the
detail
of output for Turtle.  While I don't expect a lot of responses, I
think
it's worth at least giving people the chance to check before the
release.

Are there things anyone wants to get into Jena 2.10.1? (and when
might it
be ready?)

          Andy








--
Regards,
*
*
*Stephen Owens*
CTO, ThoughtWire
t 647.351.9473 ext.104  I  m 416.697.3466


Reply via email to