Andy So are we all OK with moving towards a next release?
Other than finishing up some more tests for JENA-445 (the OpAsQuery with sub-queries bug) I don't have anything else that I want to get in the release, the release already includes a variety of bug fixes that I need to close out some internal bugs here so getting it sooner rather than later would be nice I can send out the email to the lists if you like? Rob On 4/19/13 11:06 AM, "Stephen Owens" <[email protected]> wrote: >I ran all of our Turtle tests against it and it performed well, no >complaints on any of the functionality. We had to change white space >handling slightly in our test cases and it seems a little more permissive, >a double semi-colon after a statement used to cause a syntax failure and >is >now silently passed. The new behaviour seems correct to me so no >complaints. > >+1 > > >On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Stephen Owens ><[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Big +1 for me. It has the concurrent modification fix that I've been >> looking forward to. We use Turtle output fairly heavily so I'll give >>2.10.1 >> a spin through our tests just to be sure it hasn't messed up anything. >>I'll >> try to do that over the weekend. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> There is one other change of note albeit minor. >>> >>> Parser-generated blank node labels change (except RDF/XML). >>> >>> N-Triples/N-Quads print using the internal label (for scalability). >>> >>> This should not matter to anyone but it is visible. It may cause the >>>odd >>> question. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> On 12/04/13 18:54, Claude Warren wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for now >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> How do people feel about a Jena 2.10.1? >>>>> >>>>> The big change I've added is the new RIOT writers, which are active >>>>>by >>>>> default. I'd like to do longer cycle on users@ because, while I've >>>>> tried >>>>> not to make visible changes, there will be some differences in the >>>>> detail >>>>> of output for Turtle. While I don't expect a lot of responses, I >>>>>think >>>>> it's worth at least giving people the chance to check before the >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> Are there things anyone wants to get into Jena 2.10.1? (and when >>>>>might >>>>> it >>>>> be ready?) >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> * >> * >> *Stephen Owens* >> CTO, ThoughtWire >> t 647.351.9473 ext.104 I m 416.697.3466 >> >> > > >-- >Regards, >* >* >*Stephen Owens* >CTO, ThoughtWire >t 647.351.9473 ext.104 I m 416.697.3466
