Yes of course, go ahead and start the testing cycle I'm not sure how important the HTTP cookie thing is anyway because the design discussions here are leaning towards using HTTP basic authentication as the shortest path to getting things done so being able to maintain cookie state over a series of requests is likely to be low priority for us for now. It would be a nice enhancement to have long term so I will file a JIRA for it.
Rob On 4/16/13 4:52 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >Rob, > >Fine by me (I have now linked the ParameterizedSparqlString page into >the query main documentation page). > >Is it OK to ask now on users@ for testing? I think that the writer >changes deserve a long(er) time so maybe a month. That's not a promise >to release on a particualr schedule - just start the prerelease cycle. > >If the HTTP usage checking takes longer, so be it. > > Andy > >On 15/04/13 23:56, Rob Vesse wrote: >> I still want to try and finish up some additional tests for >> ParameterizedSparqlString >> >> I also have another potential issue with HTTP request support that >>applies >> to both queries and updates that I would like to at least investigate >>and >> document prior to the release. For those wondering the specific issue >>is >> being able to maintain cookie state over a series of requests which is >> necessary if you want to use any sort of forms/cookie based >>authentication >> against remote endpoints. >> >> Rob >> >> >> On 4/12/13 2:21 PM, "Stephen Owens" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> Big +1 for me. It has the concurrent modification fix that I've been >>> looking forward to. We use Turtle output fairly heavily so I'll give >>> 2.10.1 >>> a spin through our tests just to be sure it hasn't messed up anything. >>> I'll >>> try to do that over the weekend. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> There is one other change of note albeit minor. >>>> >>>> Parser-generated blank node labels change (except RDF/XML). >>>> >>>> N-Triples/N-Quads print using the internal label (for scalability). >>>> >>>> This should not matter to anyone but it is visible. It may cause the >>>> odd >>>> question. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/04/13 18:54, Claude Warren wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for now >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> How do people feel about a Jena 2.10.1? >>>>>> >>>>>> The big change I've added is the new RIOT writers, which are active >>>>>>by >>>>>> default. I'd like to do longer cycle on users@ because, while I've >>>>>> tried >>>>>> not to make visible changes, there will be some differences in the >>>>>> detail >>>>>> of output for Turtle. While I don't expect a lot of responses, I >>>>>> think >>>>>> it's worth at least giving people the chance to check before the >>>>>> release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there things anyone wants to get into Jena 2.10.1? (and when >>>>>> might it >>>>>> be ready?) >>>>>> >>>>>> Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> * >>> * >>> *Stephen Owens* >>> CTO, ThoughtWire >>> t 647.351.9473 ext.104 I m 416.697.3466 >> >
