Hi, Marco
The current indexing strategy requires both the followings:
1) the predicates to be geo:lat and geo:long;
2) the datatypes of objects are: XSDfloat, XSDdecimal, XSDdouble, XSDinteger
For b) you mentioned. Jena will regard no datatypes of the objects.
Shall we remove the requirements of 2), or make it compatible with b)? Are
the datatype restrictions on the objects necessary for indexing?
Best regards,
Ying Jiang
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com>wrote:
> the current project requires the spatial data for points to come typed as
> xsd:float. otherwise data is ignored during indexing.
>
> example:
>
> a.) {will be indexed}
> airports:EGBB rdf:type airports_sc:LargeAirport ;
> geo:lat "52.4539"^^xsd:float ;
> geo:long "-1.74803"^^xsd:float ;
> rdfs:label "Birmingham International Airport"
>
> b.) {will not be indexed}
> airports:EGBB rdf:type airports_sc:LargeAirport ;
> geo:lat "52.4539";
> geo:long "-1.74803";
> rdfs:label "Birmingham International Airport"
>
> By default jena should accept geo:lat and geo:long as decimal degrees.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Ying Jiang <jpz6311...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm with the dev list. Any problems with your tests?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ying Jiang
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Andy,
> > >
> > > is Ying Jiang a member of the dev list?
> > >
> > > Marco
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > ok so I have the project now in the correct setup and the code
> compiles
> > > > fine but with 1677 warnings as mention by you
> > > >
> > > > I am going to test the code with larger rdf data sets in the coming
> > days.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 05/08/13 14:48, Marco Neumann wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 05/08/13 14:25, Marco Neumann wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Andy,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> yes, but I am discussing some details with Ying Jiang off-list
> > there
> > > >>>>> are
> > > >>>>> some configuration questions I still have. The code itself looks
> > OK.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> Great - thanks.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Could we have the discussions on-list please?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What would be the schedule for a release? Will this be part of
> the
> > > >>>> main
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> jena release? if so there need to be some dependencies worked out
> > for
> > > >>>>> apache-lucene and apache-lucene spatial on my end.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> Such as? (I didn't have any issues with the versions in the POM)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> it's a configuration option in eclipse (Kepler)+m2eclipse with
> > > >>> apache+lucene + apache+lucene+spatial I need to replicate.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> how do you compile the POM and missing dependencies? do you just
> > > create a
> > > >>> local copy of the specific jena snapshot + jars?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >> "kepler+maven nature" works for me. I haven't tried mvn
> > eclipse:eclipse
> > > >>
> > > >> or you can build with:
> > > >>
> > > >> mvn clean test
> > > >>
> > > >> Dependencies work with "mvn dependency:resolve" and with
> > > >> Eclipse: "maven->Update Project"
> > > >>
> > > >> Andy
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Marco Neumann
> > > > KONA
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Marco Neumann
> > > KONA
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
>
