This seems a little odd to me. It looks like they are placing these artifacts in their own group ID. However it still sets a slightly strange precedence if Apache Foo can release artifacts named Apache Bar even if they do so under their own maven coordinates
Is this something they've been doing for a long time or is this a new thing? If new why couldn't they work with us to provide the fixes back to Jena? Rob On 07/09/2015 17:35, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >PMC, > >Clerezza is proposing redistributing modified Jena 2.13.0 binaries. >NOTICE and LICENSE have been changed. These would go into the Apache >release maven repo. > >The binaries are currently at: > >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009/ >org/apache/clerezza/ext/org.apache.jena.jena-core/2.13.0_1/ > >(Modified version number as well - it does not make clear that 2.13.0_1 >is not Jena-project release.) > > Andy > >-------- Forwarded Message -------- >Subject: Re: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules >Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 12:12:23 +0100 >From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] > >On 06/09/15 18:39, Reto Gmür wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 05/09/15 16:36, Reto Gmür wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the >>>>following >>>> improvements: >>>> >>>> - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose >>>>their >>>> OSGi-DS services >>>> - Updated to latest version of Jersey >>>> - Updated Jena Version >>>> - Contains integration tests >>>> >>>> It contains the following artifacts that shall be released to maven >>>> central: >>>> >>> >>> Where are the convenience binaries? (I didn't see anything on >>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories but may have missed >>> something) >> >> Enabled now. Here: >> >>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009 >>/ > >Could you have used Jena's OSGi artifact? > >The binaries have had the NOTICE and LICENSE files replaced in both jar >and sources.jar. These miss the necessary declarations. > > Andy > >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> > > >
