On 9 Sep 2015 13:50, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This seems a little odd to me.  It looks like they are placing these
> artifacts in their own group ID.  However it still sets a slightly strange
> precedence if Apache Foo can release artifacts named Apache Bar even if
> they do so under their own maven coordinates
>
> Is this something they've been doing for a long time or is this a new
> thing?

It is something which clerezza had been doing for a very long time. Apache
servicemix does the same for other projects that do not ship OSGi bundles,
see: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.servicemix.bundles

Of course in an ideal world Jena would be modular and all it's jars would
also be OSGi bundles, after all this is just a couple of lines in the
manifest file.

>
> If new why couldn't they work with us to provide the fixes back to Jena?

What clerezza is doing is not an actual fix, but rather a wrapping. Stian
did something similar.

Reto
>
> Rob
>
> On 07/09/2015 17:35, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >PMC,
> >
> >Clerezza is proposing redistributing modified Jena 2.13.0 binaries.
> >NOTICE and LICENSE have been changed.  These would go into the Apache
> >release maven repo.
> >
> >The binaries are currently at:
> >
> >
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009/
> >org/apache/clerezza/ext/org.apache.jena.jena-core/2.13.0_1/
> >
> >(Modified version number as well - it does not make clear that 2.13.0_1
> >is not Jena-project release.)
> >
> >       Andy
> >
> >-------- Forwarded Message --------
> >Subject: Re: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules
> >Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 12:12:23 +0100
> >From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
> >To: [email protected]
> >
> >On 06/09/15 18:39, Reto Gmür wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05/09/15 16:36, Reto Gmür wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the
> >>>>following
> >>>> improvements:
> >>>>
> >>>> - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose
> >>>>their
> >>>> OSGi-DS services
> >>>> - Updated to latest version of Jersey
> >>>> - Updated Jena Version
> >>>> - Contains integration tests
> >>>>
> >>>> It contains the following artifacts that shall be released to maven
> >>>> central:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Where are the convenience binaries?  (I didn't see anything on
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories but may have missed
> >>> something)
> >>
> >> Enabled now. Here:
> >>
> >>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009
> >>/
> >
> >Could you have used Jena's OSGi artifact?
> >
> >The binaries have had the NOTICE and LICENSE files replaced in both jar
> >and sources.jar. These miss the necessary declarations.
> >
> >       Andy
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Reto
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to