I suppose one of us should reach out and ask why they don't contribute the fixes back to Jena. Who is the OSGI guru here?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: > This seems a little odd to me. It looks like they are placing these > artifacts in their own group ID. However it still sets a slightly strange > precedence if Apache Foo can release artifacts named Apache Bar even if > they do so under their own maven coordinates > > Is this something they've been doing for a long time or is this a new > thing? > > If new why couldn't they work with us to provide the fixes back to Jena? > > Rob > > On 07/09/2015 17:35, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >PMC, > > > >Clerezza is proposing redistributing modified Jena 2.13.0 binaries. > >NOTICE and LICENSE have been changed. These would go into the Apache > >release maven repo. > > > >The binaries are currently at: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009/ > >org/apache/clerezza/ext/org.apache.jena.jena-core/2.13.0_1/ > > > >(Modified version number as well - it does not make clear that 2.13.0_1 > >is not Jena-project release.) > > > > Andy > > > >-------- Forwarded Message -------- > >Subject: Re: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules > >Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 12:12:23 +0100 > >From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] > > > >On 06/09/15 18:39, Reto Gmür wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 05/09/15 16:36, Reto Gmür wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the > >>>>following > >>>> improvements: > >>>> > >>>> - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose > >>>>their > >>>> OSGi-DS services > >>>> - Updated to latest version of Jersey > >>>> - Updated Jena Version > >>>> - Contains integration tests > >>>> > >>>> It contains the following artifacts that shall be released to maven > >>>> central: > >>>> > >>> > >>> Where are the convenience binaries? (I didn't see anything on > >>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories but may have missed > >>> something) > >> > >> Enabled now. Here: > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009 > >>/ > > > >Could you have used Jena's OSGi artifact? > > > >The binaries have had the NOTICE and LICENSE files replaced in both jar > >and sources.jar. These miss the necessary declarations. > > > > Andy > > > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Reto > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
