If this is a matter of "just a couple of lines in the manifest file" cannot a patch be created to do that in Jena itself? Are there inter-module dependency issues that make that difficult?
--- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library On Sep 10, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 Sep 2015 13:50, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This seems a little odd to me. It looks like they are placing these >> artifacts in their own group ID. However it still sets a slightly strange >> precedence if Apache Foo can release artifacts named Apache Bar even if >> they do so under their own maven coordinates >> >> Is this something they've been doing for a long time or is this a new >> thing? > > It is something which clerezza had been doing for a very long time. Apache > servicemix does the same for other projects that do not ship OSGi bundles, > see: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.servicemix.bundles > > Of course in an ideal world Jena would be modular and all it's jars would > also be OSGi bundles, after all this is just a couple of lines in the > manifest file. > >> >> If new why couldn't they work with us to provide the fixes back to Jena? > > What clerezza is doing is not an actual fix, but rather a wrapping. Stian > did something similar. > > Reto >> >> Rob >> >> On 07/09/2015 17:35, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> PMC, >>> >>> Clerezza is proposing redistributing modified Jena 2.13.0 binaries. >>> NOTICE and LICENSE have been changed. These would go into the Apache >>> release maven repo. >>> >>> The binaries are currently at: >>> >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009/ >>> org/apache/clerezza/ext/org.apache.jena.jena-core/2.13.0_1/ >>> >>> (Modified version number as well - it does not make clear that 2.13.0_1 >>> is not Jena-project release.) >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: [] 201508 Release of 23 Clerezza modules >>> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 12:12:23 +0100 >>> From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> On 06/09/15 18:39, Reto Gmür wrote: >>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 05/09/15 16:36, Reto Gmür wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a partial clerezza release of 23 modules bringing the >>>>>> following >>>>>> improvements: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Fixed issues preventing rdf.rdfjson and rdf.jena.sparql to expose >>>>>> their >>>>>> OSGi-DS services >>>>>> - Updated to latest version of Jersey >>>>>> - Updated Jena Version >>>>>> - Contains integration tests >>>>>> >>>>>> It contains the following artifacts that shall be released to maven >>>>>> central: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where are the convenience binaries? (I didn't see anything on >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories but may have missed >>>>> something) >>>> >>>> Enabled now. Here: >>>> >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1009 >>>> / >>> >>> Could you have used Jena's OSGi artifact? >>> >>> The binaries have had the NOTICE and LICENSE files replaced in both jar >>> and sources.jar. These miss the necessary declarations. >>> >>> Andy >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Reto >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>
