For information, as I think message was for mailing list. Regards
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Milamber <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 8:19 AM Subject: Re: View Results Tree: Drop browser renderer To: UBIK LOAD PACK Support <[email protected]> Hello, I'm agree to suppress this renderer. It's not very useful, bad rendering and too slow. Milamber On 26/09/2018 08:55, UBIK LOAD PACK Support wrote: > Hello, > Isn't it time to drop Browser component and dependency on Java FX in next > version ?: > > - It is not available in OpenJDK which should become the most used JVM ? > It currently trigger an ugly stacktrace > - It introduces complexity and did not offer that much interest as > initially expected > > > Regards > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 8:10 PM Felix Schumacher < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 07.04.2018 um 09:14 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>> Hello, >>> In jdk11, oracle will split javafx and javase. >>> This component uses javafx, I initially thought it would be a better >>> renderer but due to security limitations on resources download, it ended >> up >>> much less useful and rendering is always partial. >>> >>> So I propose to drop it in next 4.1 . >> Is there any chance to bypass the limitations on resource download? I >> found the rendering to be a bit better than the built-in "browser", but >> there is certainly a lot of room for improvement. >> >> Felix >> >>> Throughts? >>> Regards >>> >>> >> -- Regards Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack> Cordialement L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
