My 2 cents below.

Regards

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:15 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:

>
>
> Am 12.10.2018 um 21:44 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> > Hello Felix,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback.
> > Regarding the place where to put them, frankly I don't know.
> > Andrei proposed to make them available in jmeter-plugins plugins manager
> > but required that we do the move to some github repo and contribute a
> > plugin descriptor.
> > I must say that for now, I feel it's too much work for me , which I
> prefer
> > to invest on useful features.
> >
> > Should we create a github jmeter-legacy-plugins project ?
> Would it be enough to create a new branch in our svn repository? That
> should be mirrored automatically to github.
>

I think it would be better to create a new github project

>
> What would be the plan for releasing those plugins?
>

Move them to this repo
Create a plugin descriptor
Then they will live their end of life

>
> If we donate them to someone outside of Apache, would we have to rename
> the packages and would old test plans still work?
>

I think we need to keep package name to avoid breaking existing plans.

>
> Scratching my head.
>   Felix
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 PM Felix Schumacher <
> > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 12. Oktober 2018 20:43:50 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com>:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Do we have a consensus on dropping RenderInBrowser ?
> >> I like it, as it gives a nicer rendering than the really old java
> >> component, but have to admit that JavaFX is going to be a lot harder to
> >> find in the default installation. And my pages are probably not the most
> >> complex ones, so there are no problems from missing resources.
> >>
> >> Has anyone has tried to get JavaFX as an Extremfall dependency into the
> >> build process?
> >>
> >> All in all I am +-0 to kick it out.
> >>
> >> Do we have a place for those old 'plugins'? That would be useful for the
> >> mongodb plugin, too.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>   Felix
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:43 PM UBIK LOAD PACK Support <
> >>> supp...@ubikloadpack.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> For information, as I think message was for mailing list.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>>> From: Milamber <milam...@apache.org>
> >>>> Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 8:19 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: View Results Tree: Drop browser renderer
> >>>> To: UBIK LOAD PACK Support <supp...@ubikloadpack.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm agree to suppress this renderer. It's not very useful, bad
> >>> rendering
> >>>> and too slow.
> >>>>
> >>>> Milamber
> >>>>
> >>>> On 26/09/2018 08:55, UBIK LOAD PACK Support wrote:
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>> Isn't it time to drop Browser component and dependency on Java FX
> >>> in next
> >>>>> version ?:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      - It is not available in OpenJDK which should become the most
> >>> used
> >>>> JVM ?
> >>>>>      It currently trigger an ugly stacktrace
> >>>>>      - It introduces complexity and did not offer that much interest
> >>> as
> >>>>>      initially expected
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 8:10 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >>>>> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 07.04.2018 um 09:14 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>> In jdk11, oracle will split javafx and javase.
> >>>>>>> This component uses javafx, I initially thought it would be a
> >>> better
> >>>>>>> renderer but due to security limitations on resources download,
> >>> it
> >>>> ended
> >>>>>> up
> >>>>>>> much less useful and rendering is always partial.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So I propose to drop it in next 4.1 .
> >>>>>> Is there any chance to bypass the limitations on resource
> >>> download? I
> >>>>>> found the rendering to be a bit better than the built-in
> >>> "browser", but
> >>>>>> there is certainly a lot of room for improvement.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Felix
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Throughts?
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team
> >>>> Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cordialement
> >>>> L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com>
> >>>> Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
> >>>>
> >
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to