Hello Felix, Thanks for your feedback. Regarding the place where to put them, frankly I don't know. Andrei proposed to make them available in jmeter-plugins plugins manager but required that we do the move to some github repo and contribute a plugin descriptor. I must say that for now, I feel it's too much work for me , which I prefer to invest on useful features.
Should we create a github jmeter-legacy-plugins project ? Regards On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 PM Felix Schumacher < [email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 12. Oktober 2018 20:43:50 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad < > [email protected]>: > >Hello, > > > >Do we have a consensus on dropping RenderInBrowser ? > > I like it, as it gives a nicer rendering than the really old java > component, but have to admit that JavaFX is going to be a lot harder to > find in the default installation. And my pages are probably not the most > complex ones, so there are no problems from missing resources. > > Has anyone has tried to get JavaFX as an Extremfall dependency into the > build process? > > All in all I am +-0 to kick it out. > > Do we have a place for those old 'plugins'? That would be useful for the > mongodb plugin, too. > > Regards, > Felix > > > >Thanks > >Regards > > > >On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:43 PM UBIK LOAD PACK Support < > >[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> For information, as I think message was for mailing list. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- > >> From: Milamber <[email protected]> > >> Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 8:19 AM > >> Subject: Re: View Results Tree: Drop browser renderer > >> To: UBIK LOAD PACK Support <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm agree to suppress this renderer. It's not very useful, bad > >rendering > >> and too slow. > >> > >> Milamber > >> > >> On 26/09/2018 08:55, UBIK LOAD PACK Support wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > Isn't it time to drop Browser component and dependency on Java FX > >in next > >> > version ?: > >> > > >> > - It is not available in OpenJDK which should become the most > >used > >> JVM ? > >> > It currently trigger an ugly stacktrace > >> > - It introduces complexity and did not offer that much interest > >as > >> > initially expected > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 8:10 PM Felix Schumacher < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Am 07.04.2018 um 09:14 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > >> >>> Hello, > >> >>> In jdk11, oracle will split javafx and javase. > >> >>> This component uses javafx, I initially thought it would be a > >better > >> >>> renderer but due to security limitations on resources download, > >it > >> ended > >> >> up > >> >>> much less useful and rendering is always partial. > >> >>> > >> >>> So I propose to drop it in next 4.1 . > >> >> Is there any chance to bypass the limitations on resource > >download? I > >> >> found the rendering to be a bit better than the built-in > >"browser", but > >> >> there is certainly a lot of room for improvement. > >> >> > >> >> Felix > >> >> > >> >>> Throughts? > >> >>> Regards > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Regards > >> Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team > >> Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack> > >> > >> > >> Cordialement > >> L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> > >> Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack> > >> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
