On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:36 PM, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jamie: > > :-) > > how about automatic "YES" for RC release provided there is not a single > "NO" ? As long as there are at least three YES votes to go along with the no NO votes. :-) Seriously, this falls into the lines of standard Apache release process guidelines. Not something that is really changeable except under extreme circumstances. (example would be shortening the 72 hour window for an emergency security release) Dan > > Andrei > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: release by subsystem > From: Jamie G. <[email protected]> > To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 07:32:11 PM CDT >> RC's are a tagged and signed entity that are released from Apache - >> that requires a vote. The nightly snapshot builds are available for >> integration purposes in the mean time. >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Andrei Pozolotin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Jamie: >>> >>> cant you make a case that RC is not really a release? >>> >>> Andrei >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >>> From: Jamie G. <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 07:24:53 PM CDT >>> >>> Sorry for jumping in here, >>> >>> Apache builds require approval before release: >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>> >>> As to release schedule, that's purely at the discretion of the >>> community to my best understanding. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrei Pozolotin >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Guillaume: >>> >>> how about automatic, once a month, karaf RC-XXX release, w/o vote? >>> >>> Andrei. >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >>> From: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 06:24:24 PM CDT >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Andrei Pozolotin < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> *Jean-Baptiste, Łukasz** >>> * >>> FYI: >>> >>> 1) I released a jenkins plugin which allows incremental cascaded >>> releases from any level of dependency tree: >>> >>> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Maven+Cascade+Release+Plugin >>> >>> Thx for the heads up. >>> >>> >>> 2) I hope you can switch away from monolithic releases and release >>> karaf modules/subsystems on demand and often. >>> >>> Releasing karaf is fairly easy, and we rarely are waiting for third party >>> dependencies. >>> When that happens, it's mostly because we have bugs waiting to be fixed. >>> >>> >>> 3) IIRC, the first time "3.0.0.RC1 will come out in 2 weeks" was >>> promised on this mailing list about 2 years back :-) >>> >>> And this has nothing to do with the release process. Technically speaking, >>> trunk or branches are mostly always in a releasable state. >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Andrei >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:10 PM CST >>> >>> Hi Andrei, >>> >>> I understand your point. >>> >>> Some parts are really tight together. However, that's the purpose of >>> the minimal distribution and framework: >>> >>> - framework should provide the most minimal Karaf container (however, >>> it embeds Aries Blueprint for instance, as Karaf bundles use it) >>> - minimal is a very lightweight Karaf container, the purpose is to let >>> the user create a custom distribution on top of that. >>> >>> I'm listening all proposals to improve these distributions ! >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 02/07/2013 05:30 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: >>> >>> *Jean-Baptiste* >>> >>> I am curious if you envision to change karaf layout so release by >>> subsystem is possible. >>> >>> For example, if I use minimal sub set of karaf, which does not need >>> Aries, why should I wait for it? >>> >>> this is similar to how ops4j was partitioned way back, so there are >>> no monolithic Godzilla releases any more. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Andrei >>> >>> >>> > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
