THAT all said, I would also like much more frequent releases. :-) Dan
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:36 PM, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jamie: >> >> :-) >> >> how about automatic "YES" for RC release provided there is not a single >> "NO" ? > > As long as there are at least three YES votes to go along with the no NO > votes. :-) > > Seriously, this falls into the lines of standard Apache release process > guidelines. Not something that is really changeable except under extreme > circumstances. (example would be shortening the 72 hour window for an > emergency security release) > > Dan > > >> >> Andrei >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >> From: Jamie G. <[email protected]> >> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 07:32:11 PM CDT >>> RC's are a tagged and signed entity that are released from Apache - >>> that requires a vote. The nightly snapshot builds are available for >>> integration purposes in the mean time. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Andrei Pozolotin >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Jamie: >>>> >>>> cant you make a case that RC is not really a release? >>>> >>>> Andrei >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >>>> From: Jamie G. <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 07:24:53 PM CDT >>>> >>>> Sorry for jumping in here, >>>> >>>> Apache builds require approval before release: >>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>>> >>>> As to release schedule, that's purely at the discretion of the >>>> community to my best understanding. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jamie >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrei Pozolotin >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Guillaume: >>>> >>>> how about automatic, once a month, karaf RC-XXX release, w/o vote? >>>> >>>> Andrei. >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >>>> From: Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Tue 12 Mar 2013 06:24:24 PM CDT >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Andrei Pozolotin < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> *Jean-Baptiste, Łukasz** >>>> * >>>> FYI: >>>> >>>> 1) I released a jenkins plugin which allows incremental cascaded >>>> releases from any level of dependency tree: >>>> >>>> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Maven+Cascade+Release+Plugin >>>> >>>> Thx for the heads up. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2) I hope you can switch away from monolithic releases and release >>>> karaf modules/subsystems on demand and often. >>>> >>>> Releasing karaf is fairly easy, and we rarely are waiting for third party >>>> dependencies. >>>> When that happens, it's mostly because we have bugs waiting to be fixed. >>>> >>>> >>>> 3) IIRC, the first time "3.0.0.RC1 will come out in 2 weeks" was >>>> promised on this mailing list about 2 years back :-) >>>> >>>> And this has nothing to do with the release process. Technically speaking, >>>> trunk or branches are mostly always in a releasable state. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> Andrei >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: release by subsystem >>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Date: Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:10 PM CST >>>> >>>> Hi Andrei, >>>> >>>> I understand your point. >>>> >>>> Some parts are really tight together. However, that's the purpose of >>>> the minimal distribution and framework: >>>> >>>> - framework should provide the most minimal Karaf container (however, >>>> it embeds Aries Blueprint for instance, as Karaf bundles use it) >>>> - minimal is a very lightweight Karaf container, the purpose is to let >>>> the user create a custom distribution on top of that. >>>> >>>> I'm listening all proposals to improve these distributions ! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 02/07/2013 05:30 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: >>>> >>>> *Jean-Baptiste* >>>> >>>> I am curious if you envision to change karaf layout so release by >>>> subsystem is possible. >>>> >>>> For example, if I use minimal sub set of karaf, which does not need >>>> Aries, why should I wait for it? >>>> >>>> this is similar to how ops4j was partitioned way back, so there are >>>> no monolithic Godzilla releases any more. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> Andrei >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
