On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 22:42 +0200, Pavel Janík wrote: > From: Dwayne Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:23:26 +0200 > > > I care why its like that but I care more about how we can change that. > > We can count correctly ;-) > > Have a look at > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/buglist.cgi?issue_id=49130+49478+50179+50987+52465+52646+52754+52758+52804+52814+52824+52841+52855+52856+52857+52878+52880+52882+52891+52900+52906+52911+52917+52918+52921+52943+52944+52964+52965+52989+53014+53015+53016+53019+53020+53021+53022+53028+53029+53030+53152+53186+53248+53367+53379+53381+53475+53497+53541+53738+53760+53803+53836
And there I thought you were going to send me an exciting list. Nope its the same old same old in that list. If I hadn't got a lot of South African languages in there would be very little show. For an idea of how the figures were done. Counted languages in localize files ie languages that actually exist. Group cooperative groups eg Translate.org.za and some of the Indic languages. Do that and I'm afraid you arrive at low figures. > This is the list of issues in latest l10n CVS. And there are at least > another 10 languages not merged (will be done for 2.0.1). That is better news. But it still means its not in 2.0 :( and it still means we're a long long way from anything particularly radical. If we were adding 25 languages then I'd get shivers up my spine! -- Dwayne Bailey Translate.org.za +27-12-460-1095 (w) +27-83-443-7114 (cell) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
