El jue, 11-05-2006 a las 00:02 +0200, Michael Wechner escribió: > Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > > > starting from scratch strikes me as a supremely stupid idea. > > > not at all, because starting with this means starting with a specific > opinion > which maybe somebody doesn't agree with at all.
That is the reason why we have to *read* the proposal and determine the points where we do not agree. ...and a proposal is *always* the opinion of someone and get adopted by the community feedback. > It's rather a very unfair political trick to push people into a certain > direction. > > If that's what's intended then you might call the community stupid. What the hack are you talking about? If you do not compare the draft with a political trick then why you make such a comparison at all? I took the time that we finally get some guidelines on the way (which are *way* overdue) and this is your reaction. Till now it always worked like this somebody steps up presents a proposal and it got discussed and now it is a political trick. Weird. > > Btw, I haven't read the document yet and I don't have to in order to > point the above out, which means I am not opinionated re this document. > Maybe, just maybe, one should have read the document before starting thus a fuzz. The document is a proposal and should be read by all PMC members and if something does not fit into this community then we should discuss this points. > So, who do you really call stupid? What? Gregor never called no one stupid! salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
