Richard Frovarp wrote: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hi Lenya devs, >> >> does it already make sense to open a branch for 2.0 and start 2.1-dev >> in the trunk? >> >> I'm working on some quite fundamental changes to the menubar >> generation (migrating from XSP to static XML), and really leveraging >> the benefits without cluttering the sitemaps with selectors would >> require to break backwards compatibility. Updating wouldn't be much >> difficult for users, though. I'm also not quite sure yet if all of the >> changes make sense, so I don't want to commit them to the stable branch. >> >> WDYT? Should I start a vote? >> >> -- Andreas >> > > Makes sense. Should we maybe come up with a roadmap of what we want to > do in 2.1? That way we'll know when 2.1 is done.
i'm also +1 for a 2.0 branch. nonetheless, we should have a roadmap discussion rsn and try to determine * which issues we need to address in further 2.0.x maintenance releases * when we want to release 2.1 * and accordingly, which changes should be post 2.1 so as not to enter another endless release cycle. unfortunately, my talk is pretty cheap atm, due to having effectively lost two weeks and a conference i'm helping organise (in case anyone's around: http://lac.linuxaudio.org). i hope to re-join actively at the beginning of march. is there already a wishlist in the wiki? if not, i'll start one, and then we can sort it into must-haves for 2.0.x, must-haves for 2.1, and nice-to-haves and 3.0 stuff. wdyt? -- Jörn Nettingsmeier "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
