Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On 2/7/08, Jann Forrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I think we should try to avoid breaking backwards compatibility or if we >>> really have to, a migration path should be described. >>> What should we propose to people still using 1.2. Upgrading to 2.0 or >>> wait for 2.1? If 2.1 is not backward compatible with 2.0 we will have >>> three version which are not compatible which makes upgrading a real pain >>> :-( >>> Jann >> Let Lenya 1.2 users upgrade to Lenya 1.3 since complete >> backwards-compatibility was a goal. Lenya 1.3 should be usable in a >> few weeks. The high-level feature list reads just like 2.0's What's >> New. The largest strategic difference is no Java in Modules, but that >> cannot be a problem since 1.2 did not have that feature. Just copy >> Lenya 1.2 Publications to the pubs directory. The implementations is >> very different from Lenya 2, but a normal user will not care. The new >> features become available after a simple conversion to the new >> datastore. (Jorn will love that Areas have been removed.) >> >> This frees Lenya 2 development to focus on new features for new >> installations. > > now that your work on 1.3 has gained momentum, we should really discuss > what to do with it to take the best of both worlds into lenya 3.0... the > current situation is somewhat unfortunate - i'm sure there are many good > ideas in 1.3, but i have no time to track it, and i guess the same is > true for the other 2.0 devs. > it would be really great if you gave a 1.3 presentation at a lenya > hackathon one of these days - got any vacation plans to old europe? > That would be nice :-) I like the idae of the 1.3 backward compatiblity but changing from 1.2 to 1.3 is risky because solprovider is the only dev working on this version. And if you want to move from 1.3 to 2.x you will probably have the same problems as changing from 1.2. to 2.x.
Jann
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
