On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:37:18 +0100, Christian Markgraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Robert, Laurent, > > Am Samstag 12 M�rz 2005 13:19 schrieb Robert Wiblin: > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:12:44 +0100, Laurent Godard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi robert > > > > > > > Any chance of this being solved before 2.0? > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44793 > > > > > > does this mean that en_GB is not defined (eg inside DicOOo) or does > > > it mean that this is defined and usable in OOo as en_GB but the > > > words are not the same ? > > > > Currently there is no th_GB file in the dict folder. You can copy the > > th_en_US file to th_GB if you want, and then edit the dictionary.lst > > to use the en_US thesaurus for en_GB simply add > en,GB,th_en_US,English (United Kingdom),thes_en_US.zip > to thesavail.lst and/or for offline use to thes.txt. > > I see no need to use 2 files for that
Yep, that would work for sure if we could get it into 2.0. But again, it's only a temporary fix until we get something better. We wouldn't tolerate using a en_US dictionary as a en_GB dictionary, because it's borderline useless, so we should probably find out where we got the thesaurus for en_US for 2.0 and see if they can also make or sell us one for en_GB. Who manages this sort of thing? > > Chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
