On Saturday 12 March 2005 13:43, Robert Wiblin wrote: > We wouldn't > tolerate using a en_US dictionary as a en_GB dictionary, because it's > borderline useless, so we should probably find out where we got the > thesaurus for en_US for 2.0 and see if they can also make or sell us > one for en_GB.
It's based on WordNet which contains BE and AE spellings, e.g. http://wordnet.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn2.0?stage=1&word=program Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
