You mean this current thesaurus is ambidextrous (so to speak)? In that case we just need to get an antry added to the .lst file to make it recognise the th_en_US_new thesaurus as also the thesaurus for when the user switches to GB. Who can do that before 2.0?
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:49:44 +0100, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 12 March 2005 13:43, Robert Wiblin wrote: > > > We wouldn't > > tolerate using a en_US dictionary as a en_GB dictionary, because it's > > borderline useless, so we should probably find out where we got the > > thesaurus for en_US for 2.0 and see if they can also make or sell us > > one for en_GB. > > It's based on WordNet which contains BE and AE spellings, e.g. > http://wordnet.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn2.0?stage=1&word=program > > Regards > Daniel > > -- > http://www.danielnaber.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Robert Wiblin [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Let's never come back here again, because it will never be as much fun." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
