Dmitri Gabinski wrote: > Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:58:33 +0200, Thomas Lange - Sun Germany - ham02 - > Hamburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis: > >> Do you mean a single extension? > > Yes, I've given some more details in my answer to Olivier's message. > >> Just of curiosity I had a look into the code and I think it should work >> as well if they are into separate extensions as long as the node names >> for the dictionary files in the configuration do differ... > > Ah, good then. However, if different dictionaries are developed by different > teams without coordination, they may use node names they find intuitive > which may coincide.
If people outside the core developer cycle want to provide an extensions, I recommend to use the reversed domain schema notation. If e.g. you are employed by company "linguprovider" in Russia that has the domain linguprovider.ru you could name your node "ru.linguprovider.grabinski.dict_ru" This should help to avoid name clashes. If your company was too big to make you feel comfortable with being the only "Grabinski", you could add more "namespaces", e.g. "ru.linguprovider.division1.grabinski.dict_ru" Just break it down to a level where you think you can arrange everything easily. If you are doing your dictionary just as a private person you can use your own domain or your e-mail address etc. This should help to keep the probability of name clashes low. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
